This study conformed to The Venetoclax in vivo Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki), printed in the British

Medical Journal (18 July 1964). The experimental procedure was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Southern California. All participants signed the written informed consent. The primary task used in this study was a four-element finger sequence task. The participant positioned the four fingers (5th, 4th, middle and index fingers) of his or her non-dominant hand on four keys (Z, X, C and V) of a standard computer keyboard. The four-element sequence was displayed on a computer monitor positioned in front of the participant (Fig. 1, top). Each of the four numbers on the computer screen was embedded within a square box. The participant was told that the relative position of their four fingers on the keyboard corresponded to the relative position of the four squares on the computer screen. Thus, when performing the task with the left hand, the box furthest to the left on the computer screen corresponded to the fifth finger and the box furthest to the right corresponded to the index finger.

The participant was additionally told that the sequence with which the keys were pressed should follow the numerical sequence of 1-2-3-4. Thus, for the sequence displayed on the computer screen (4-1-3-2), the correct order of key presses was 4th finger–index finger–middle finger–5th finger when using the left hand to perform the task. At the beginning of each trial, the sequence 4-1-3-2 was displayed Selleckchem HSP inhibitor on the computer monitor for 600 ms, followed by a ‘go’ signal.

Participants were instructed to start the movement as soon as they saw the ‘go’ signal and finish the sequence as fast as possible. Feedback about performance (accuracy and the time taken to finish all four key presses) was given after each trial (Fig. 1, top). Participants practiced the same sequence throughout the experiment. The secondary task (probe task) was a two-choice audio–vocal RT task. Participants heard either a high pitch (1000 Hz) or a low pitch (500 Hz) sound via headphones and were required to make a vocal response by saying ‘high’ or ‘low’ correspondingly into a microphone. The audio stimulus was presented 100 ms after the sequence was displayed ADP ribosylation factor on the computer monitor (prior to movement onset), at which time the primary task was assumed to engage planning processes (Fig. 1, top). Participants were assigned to groups based on whether they performed the secondary probe task (control vs. probe) and whether they received the rTMS manipulation (No rTMS vs. dPM rTMS). This resulted in four experimental groups: Control–NoTMS, Probe–NoTMS, Control–dPM, and Probe–dPM with a sample size of 10 for each group. The last group of participants (Probe–M1, n = 10) served as the TMS site control. The experiment took place over two consecutive days.