PK parameters were calculated by noncompartmental analysis using WinNonlin version 5.0.1 (Pharsight Corporation Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA). For each PK parameter, parametric and/or nonparametric descriptive statistics were

calculated. Parametric statistics included mean, standard deviation (SD), geometric means, and percent coefficient of variation. Nonparametric statistics included median and range (minimum–maximum). Drug–drug interaction was based on the AUC0–24 of omeprazole. Analysis of variance models were used for analyzing AUC and C max parameters based on natural log-transformed values. This included the effects for treatment (without or with IPE) as a random effect. The estimate of the ratio between the two treatments for these parameters and the corresponding 90 % confidence intervals (CI) for the ratio were obtained by {Selleck Anti-cancer Compound Library|Selleck Anticancer Compound Library|Selleck Anti-cancer Compound Library|Selleck Anticancer Compound Library|Selleckchem Anti-cancer Compound Library|Selleckchem Anticancer Compound Library|Selleckchem Anti-cancer Compound Library|Selleckchem Anticancer Compound Library|Anti-cancer Compound Library|Anticancer Compound Library|Anti-cancer Compound Library|Anticancer Compound Library|Anti-cancer Compound Library|Anticancer Compound Library|Anti-cancer Compound Library|Anticancer Compound Library|Anti-cancer Compound Library|Anticancer Compound Library|Anti-cancer Compound Library|Anticancer Compound Library|Anti-cancer Compound Library|Anticancer Compound Library|Anti-cancer Compound Library|Anticancer Compound Library|Anti-cancer Compound Library|Anticancer Compound Library|buy Anti-cancer Compound Library|Anti-cancer Compound Library ic50|Anti-cancer Compound Library price|Anti-cancer Compound Library cost|Anti-cancer Compound Library solubility dmso|Anti-cancer Compound Library purchase|Anti-cancer Compound Library manufacturer|Anti-cancer Compound Library research buy|Anti-cancer Compound Library order|Anti-cancer Compound Library mouse|Anti-cancer Compound Library chemical structure|Anti-cancer Compound Library mw|Anti-cancer Compound Library molecular weight|Anti-cancer Compound Library datasheet|Anti-cancer Compound Library supplier|Anti-cancer Compound Library in vitro|Anti-cancer Compound Library cell line|Anti-cancer Compound Library concentration|Anti-cancer Compound Library nmr|Anti-cancer Compound Library in vivo|Anti-cancer Compound Library clinical trial|Anti-cancer Compound Library cell assay|Anti-cancer Compound Library screening|Anti-cancer Compound Library high throughput|buy Anticancer Compound Library|Anticancer Compound Library ic50|Anticancer Compound Library price|Anticancer Compound Library cost|Anticancer Compound Library solubility dmso|Anticancer Compound Library purchase|Anticancer Compound Library manufacturer|Anticancer Compound Library research buy|Anticancer Compound Library order|Anticancer Compound Library chemical structure|Anticancer Compound Library datasheet|Anticancer Compound Library supplier|Anticancer Compound Library in vitro|Anticancer Compound Library cell line|Anticancer Compound Library concentration|Anticancer Compound Library clinical trial|Anticancer Compound Library cell assay|Anticancer Compound Library screening|Anticancer Compound Library high throughput|Anti-cancer Compound high throughput screening| exponentiating the difference selleck chemicals llc in logarithms,

and were used to determine whether a drug–drug interaction of the two treatments (without or with IPE) occurred. 2.5 Safety Assessments Safety evaluations consisted of monitoring adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory measurements (chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis), vital signs (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and oral body temperature), and physical examinations. 3 Results 3.1 Study Participants Thirty healthy subjects were enrolled, all of whom were given at least one dose of the study drug and learn more were included in the safety analysis. The mean age (SD) was 38.5 (10.2) years, and mean weight and BMI (SD) were 78.5 Amylase (13.9) kg and 27.5 (3.6) kg/m2, respectively. Subjects were primarily white (n = 21; 70.0 %) and black/African American (n = 7; 23.3 %). Twenty-eight subjects completed the study and were included in the PK analyses. Two subjects discontinued the study; one was unable to comply with study requirements and one did not present to the clinic on day 7. Mean (SD) treatment compliance based on capsule counts was 100.3 % (3.5) for the 30 subjects who received omeprazole and 98.4 (4.2) for the

28 who received IPE. 3.2 Pharmacokinetics Omeprazole plasma concentration-time profiles were comparable whether the drug was administered alone or with IPE 4 g/day at steady-state concentrations (Fig. 1). Mean exposure (AUC0–24) was slightly higher and mean C max was slightly lower when omeprazole was administered without IPE than when administered with IPE (Table 1). Median T max and mean t 1/2 were similar for the two treatments (Table 1). Results from statistical analyses of drug–drug interaction are summarized in Table 2. Fig. 1 Mean (SD) omeprazole 40 mg/day plasma concentration-time curve when administered without or with icosapent ethyl 4 g/day (pharmacokinetic analysis population, n = 28).