To examine the agreement between the DASH and the QuickDASH and a

To examine the agreement between the DASH and the QuickDASH and assess whether the QuickDASH can be used instead of full DASH in patients with neck pain.

Summary of Background Data. NDI is commonly used for measuring neck-related disability in patients with neck pain; but it does not offer to assess the potential for upper extremity disability.

Methods. Patients with AZD7762 inhibitor neck pain (N = 66) were assessed on one occasion. They completed the NDI and the DASH, and 42 of them completed the CSOQ. The QuickDASH scores were extracted from the full DASH. Correlations were tested

between both versions of the DASH, the NDI, the subscales of the CSOQ, and the

VAS-pain. Correlations were considered high with r >0.75. Ranked item difficulty analysis was performed for both versions of the DASH and the NDI. The Bland and selleck kinase inhibitor Altman technique was used to assess the nature and size of score differences between 2 versions of the DASH.

Results. Item ranks identified the DASH and the QuickDASH items to be as problematic to patients as NDI items. Both the versions of DASH showed high correlation (0.82-0.83) with the NDI and moderate correlation with the CSOQ and VAS-pain. The mean QuickDASH Screening Library scores were higher (2.77 points) compared to the full DASH.

Conclusion. Though the QuickDASH reported higher disability compared to the full DASH in this patient group, high correlation between the QuickDASH and the NDI and agreement between both versions of the DASH provide preliminary evidence that the QuickDASH can be used to measure upper extremity disability in patients with neck pain.”
“Objective. The present study evaluated the fibroblast attachment and the morphologic

changes of simulated cervical root resorptions after irradiation with high-power lasers and the use of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA).

Study design. Standardized cavities were done on the coronal third of 40 single-rooted teeth and assigned into 4 groups according to the treatment applied: ( 1) untreated control, ( 2) use of MTA, ( 3) irradiation with Er:YAG laser (42 mJ, 10 Hz, 10 s), and ( 4) irradiation with high-power diode laser ( 1 W, 10 s). Fragments were prepared for SEM analysis: 6 samples of each group were plated with human gingival fibroblasts and 4 samples were used for ultrastructural analysis.

Results. The cells’ attachment was in decreasing order: G3 > G4 > G1 > G2, with statistical differences among all groups ( P < .05).

Comments are closed.