Studies were conducted over a wide range of geographical settings, including subjects with African, Asian, European and Indian descent. The characteristics of the individual studies (Table 1) and the absolute numbers of allele frequencies in the cases and controls (Table 2) were also summarized. Some studies used PCR to amplify restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) of the 1513 locus used to define genotypes (Li et al., 2002; Niño-Moreno et al.,

2007; Mokrousov et al., 2008; Xiao et BMS-777607 molecular weight al., 2009; Sambasivan et al., 2010) and allele-specific PCR assays to determine the −762 locus genotype (Niño-Moreno et al., 2007; Mokrousov et al., 2008; Xiao et al., 2009). Li et al. (2002) and Sambasivan et al. (2010) used PCR-ligation detection reactions and PCR-RFLP to define the −762 locus genotype, respectively, and Fernando et al. (2007) used amplification assays using a Sequence Detection System to define the 1513 locus genotype. It was shown that the −762TC SNP in the promoter region was associated with tuberculosis susceptibility in an Asian Indian population (Sambasivan et al., 2010), but with significant protection

against tuberculosis in a Gambian population (Li et al., 2002), and no association was identified between the 1513AC SNP and tuberculosis susceptibility in both of them. While a significant association was identified between the P2X7 1513AC variant selleck and pulmonary tuberculosis, no association was found between the −762TC polymorphism and tuberculosis susceptibility in Mexican Mestizos (Niño-Moreno et al., 2007) or Russian Caucasians (Mokrousov et al., 2008). Researchers from Australia, however, observed an association between the 1513 C allele Reverse transcriptase and extrapulmonary (compared with pulmonary) tuberculosis in an Australian Vietnamese population (Fernando et al., 2007). Xiao et al. (2009) found that neither the 1513AC nor the −762TC P2X7 variants were significantly associated with tuberculosis in a Chinese Han

population. The pooled OR using a fixed effects model for the six studies examined for the 1513 C allele was 1.44 (95% CI 1.23–1.68; P<0.00001, Fig. 1), including a total of 1044 cases and 1286 control subjects (Li et al., 2002; Fernando et al., 2007; Niño-Moreno et al., 2007; Mokrousov et al., 2008; Xiao et al., 2009; Sambasivan et al., 2010). Intrastudy heterogeneity was not observed between the six studies examined (χ2=4.58, P=0.60). A total of 857 cases and 1068 control subjects from five studies were used to carry out the metaanalysis for the −762 C allele (Li et al., 2002; Niño-Moreno et al., 2007; Mokrousov et al., 2008; Xiao et al., 2009; Sambasivan et al., 2010). Because intrastudy heterogeneity was found between the five studies (χ2=22.18, P=0.0002), the random effects model was used. The pooled OR using the random effects model was 1.01 (95% CI 0.70–1.44; P=0.97, Fig. 2).