Results: S-40542 displayed twofold higher affinity to androgen re

Results: S-40542 displayed twofold higher affinity to androgen receptor than bicalutamide in vitro. Subcutaneous repeated administration of S-40542 (10–100 mg/kg) significantly reduced the prostate weight. Oral repeated treatment with S-40542 (30, 100 mg/kg) for 28 days significantly suppressed selleck compound growth of KUCaP-2 tumor. Similar administration of bicalutamide also exerted significantly anti-tumor effect in the model. The serum prostate-specific antigen level was little influenced by the S-40542 treatment, while significantly decreased by bicalutamide. Oral

treatment with S-40542 resulted in a dose-dependent elevation of the plasma concentration, and its Cmax and AUC were much lower than those of bicalutamide. The pharmacokinetic study showed that this agent had relatively short plasma half-life and low oral bioavailability. Conclusion: S-40542 as well as bicalutamide

has shown as an anti-androgen by reducing the prostate weight of mice. Repeated oral treatment with S-40542 was shown to p53 inhibitor significantly suppress tumor growth in the KUCaP-2 xenograft model. “
“Objectives: We examined the effects of alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist (tamsulosin hydrochloride) and antimuscarinic agent (solifenacin succinate) alone or in combination on the urinary adenosine triphosphate (ATP) level and cystometric parameters before Clomifene and after bladder stimulation. Methods: Female rats were administered tamsulosin hydrochloride (0.5 or 3 µg/kg/h) and/or solifenacin succinate (20 or 100 µg/kg/h) via a subcutaneously implanted osmotic minipump. Rats receiving distilled water were used as control. After 2 weeks, continuous cystometry with physiological saline or 0.1% acetic

acid solution was performed. Urinary ATP level was also measured before and after stimulation by 0.1% acetic acid solution. Results: During cystometry with bladder stimulation, the interval between voiding became shorter and the maximum voiding pressure (MVP) became higher in the control group. In the high-dose tamsulosin and solifenacin groups, the inhibition of urinary frequency was observed. The MVP also became higher in the high-dose tamsulosin group, but such a change was not seen in the high-dose solifenacin group. In case of low-dose administration, either agent alone did not inhibit the increase of urinary frequency and MVP due to bladder stimulation. However, co-administration of these ineffective low doses of tamsulosin and solifenacin resulted in the inhibition of urinary frequency. The high-dose or low-dose solifenacin group and the co-administration group showed similar inhibition of the increase of urinary ATP after bladder stimulation.

Comments are closed.