Moving beyond the quantitation of information, key qualitative questions remain about how ‘meaning’ is transferred along with information. This is not merely an abstract question; synthetic biology can engineer reliable information transfer, but how would such systems encode or process higher order meaning, such as the difference between to ‘I must’ and ‘I want to’? Simple IF-THEN logic does not suffice. To harness essential features of biology, synthetic biologists

CX-5461 ic50 somehow need to wire components to encode choice and reward, perhaps by including feedbacks in system resource allocation. We still do not know how to engineer higher order meaning, such as desire or fear. While information theory clearly has a part to play in increasing our engineering capability, we also need to develop a functional philosophy of meaning. Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as: • of special interest DB and VRS are both selleck funded by La Caixa PhD Fellowships. MI is supported by EC FP7-610730 EVOPROG, and Wellcome Trust UK New Investigator Award WT102944.

We thank Jesper Ferkinghoff-Borg for providing us with original images of information channels inside a single protein. “
“The IC50 value of 3 has been reported as 18(5) μM in MCF-7. It actually is 185(5) μM for MCF-7 and hence the corrected Table 3 is as follows: “
“Indazoles are rare in nature, and so far only three natural products based on an indazole ring have been isolated [1]. These are the indazole alkaloids nigellicine [2], nigeglanine [3], and nigellidine [4]. The total syntheses of nigellicine and

nigeglanine are also well documented [5] and [6]. The indazole ring system is of much current interest as partial structure of a large number of biologically active compounds. Different aspects of pharmaceutical and other useful applications of indazoles Resminostat have been reviewed [7] and [8]. Some substituted indazoles exhibit relevant biological properties for development as anticancer drugs [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14] and [15]. One of the tetrasubstituted indazoles, namely, CI-958, entered clinical trials for prostate cancer treatment about a decade ago [16]. From the unsubstituted indazole derivatives the most prominent example is the ruthenium(III) compound (H2ind)[trans-RuIIICl4(Hind)2] (KP1019, Hind = 1H-indazole), which is now in clinical trials as an anticancer agent against metastatic solid tumors [17] and [18]. Of potential interest are also complexes closely related to (H2im)[trans-RuIIICl4(DMSO)(Him)] (NAMI-A, Him = imidazole) [19], an investigational drug which is currently evaluated in a clinical phase II trial for its capacity of inhibiting the process of metastasis, namely (H2ind)[trans-RuIIICl4(DMSO)(Hind)] [20] and its osmium counterpart [21].