Moreover, an extra long segment of bowel is not required (unlike Studer’s), and the procedure is versatile and not technically difficult.[9] Urodynamic evaluation

is the most objective method in assessing the functional outcome of a neobladder. Various authors have addressed the urodynamic behavior of neobladder including urethral closure characteristics.[2, 5, 7] This study was conducted to evaluate short-term functional, urodynamic and QOL outcomes of our early experience with “W” ileal orthotopic neobladder (ONB), with non-refluxing extramural serosa-lined tunnel uretero-ileal anastomosis. Consecutive men undergoing cystoprostatectomy and ONB during December 2009 to March 2011 were enrolled. The study was approved by the institute’s ethical RG7204 order committee. The protocol was explained to each participant and written informed consent was taken prior to inclusion. The orthotopic neobladder (ONB) reconstruction

was fashioned using an ileal segment made into a W configuration and serous-lined ureteral reimplantation (Ebol Eneim and Ghoneim).[10] Patients were put on clean intermittent catheterization under the following circumstances: (i) For pouch wash – initiated twice a week in early postoperative period and progressively tapered; (ii) periodic self-calibration after endoscopic management of stricture; (iii) bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) with high post-void residual urine (PVR). Evaluation included: Neobladder pouch-related quality of life evaluation (PQOL) modified from study by Gotoh et SCH772984 molecular weight al.[11] The questionnaire consisted of 31 questions (total scoring 31–120; high score is more adverse),

divided into five domains: (i) Urine evacuation domain (11 questions; scoring 11–43); (ii) urine storage domain (13 questions; scoring 13–48); (iii) micturition status domain (two questions; Progesterone scoring 2–8);(iv) limitation in daily life domain (three questions; scoring 3–15); (v) pain domain (two questions; scoring 2–6). Urodynamics (Solar silver, MMS International, Enschede, The Netherlands):(i) Free uroflowmetry – standing posture; (ii) filling and voiding cystometry (pouchometry) – sitting posture; (iii) resting urethral pressure profilometry – sitting posture; (iv) surface electromyography; (v) filling and voiding poucho-urethrography – filling in supine and voiding in standing posture. Three-lumen urethral pressure profilometry catheter (8Fr, Rusch, Germany) and single lumen balloon rectal catheter (5Fr, Medica, Medolia, Italy) were placed. Catheters were “zeroed” to atmospheric pressure keeping the transducers at the level of the superior border of pubic-symphysis. Sterile normal saline (0.9%, w/v) was used as the filling medium and infused at a rate approximately 10% of functional pouch capacity (based on bladder diary) via the urethral catheter using a motor-driven and computer-controlled infusion-pump.