Many federal and

state programs, such as Medicaid, the Department of Defense, and the Department of Veterans Affairs, have been more progressive than private health insurance programs in providing reimbursement for mental and behavioral telehealth services. For example, Medicaid programs in 80% of U.S. states already reimburse for mental health services delivered via telemethods (Center for Telehealth and eHealth Law, 2011). Several of these state Medicaid programs provide for such services by reimbursing under traditional psychotherapy CPT codes (90804–90829), as well as a separate code for a “telehealth originating site facility fee” (Q3014). There may be a role for I-PCIT check details in private practice (see Glueck, 2013), but I-PCIT may offer the most promise in stepped care models for early child problems. Elsewhere, Comer and Barlow (2014) have outlined the transformative potential of a specialty behavioral

telehealth care workforce, one that would transact with the generalist practitioner workforce to collectively ensure the highest quality and HSP inhibitor timely delivery of needed treatments to affected individuals. In a specialty behavioral telehealth care model, high-quality specialty services would be offered in real time via videoconferencing and related technologies, directly to patients in private locations with Internet accessibility such as PCP offices or directly to patient homes. Generalist mental health counselors confronted with client presentations in which they have not completed adequate training could identify credentialed behavioral telehealth specialists online and make a referral, regardless of geographic availability to specialty care in their region. Broader availability of quality referral options for specialty services, such as PCIT, would presumably reduce the high volume of patients that burdens many generalist practitioner practice settings and reduce waitlists. Specialty mental

health “clinics” can be housed online, rather than bound by geography, Etoposide mouse and systematically deliver specialty care for conditions requiring complex treatment methods less easily disseminated to front-line generalist practitioners. Internet-based treatment delivery options could liberate specialty providers from only practicing in academic and/or metropolitan regions, as is currently the norm. In conclusion, applying videoconferencing technology for the delivery of PCIT is showing great promise for improving access to PCIT, and nomothetic research investigations evaluating I-PCIT in controlled evaluations are currently underway. In recent years, the proportion of very young children prescribed psychotropic medications in outpatient care has been steadily increasing (Olfson et al., 2006, Olfson, Crystal, Huang and Gerhard, 2010 and Olfson et al., 2002).