It indicates that the sintering this website Temperature was Selleck AZD1480 the main determinant for obtaining highly conductive patterns by further testing the R sq, as listed in Table 1. The R sq was 20 Ω/cm2 at the sintering temperature of 140°C for 320 s, whereas it was significantly decreased to 6 Ω/cm2 for 260 s when the temperature was enhanced to 150°C. This lowering tendency of the R sq further resulted in a resistance lower than 1 Ω/cm2, which was compatible with the

requirement for industrial fabrication of conductive circuits [39]. Figure 3 Parameters of spray-coated silver patterns by post sintering and in situ sintering process. Table 1 R sq of spray-coated Ag patterns based on various sintering operations

Temperature R sq Time R sq Time (°C) (post sintering) (post sintering) (in situ sintering) (in situ sintering)   (Ω/sq) (s) (Ω/sq) (s) 140 20.6 320 6.1 52 150 6.3 260 4.6 40 160 3.3 120 2.2 28 170 1.4 50 1.8 20 180 1.2 35 1.4 16 190 1.0 20 1.4 15 200 0.94 17 1.1 15 In order to facilitate the pattern fabrication process to be compatible with the cost-effective fabrication process of printed electronics, an in situ sintering process was employed to substitute the general post sintering process. The S63845 in vivo silver nanoparticle inks were sprayed directly towards the substrate at high temperature (140°C ~ 200°C), in which the drying process of wet droplets and the sintering process of silver nanoparticles took place at the same time. It was shown that a highly conductive pattern with R sq of 6 Ω/cm2 could be obtained at a low sintering temperature of 140°C, compared to 20 Ω/cm2 of the post sintering-processed pattern at the same temperature. More Montelukast Sodium importantly, the time consumption of the in situ sintering process to obtain highly conductive patterns at 140°C was significantly reduced to 20 s, which was about one sixth of that of the post sintering process, as listed in Table 1. Meanwhile,

the advantages of the in situ sintering process on pattern conductivity and time consumption were not further existent when the sintering temperature was higher than 170°C, as shown in Figure 3 and Table 1. To further illuminate the mechanism of the sintering process of spray-coated silver nanoparticle inks, a metallurgical microscope was used, as shown in Figure 4a,b,c. A general post sintered conductive pattern based on inkjet printing (170°C) is shown in Figure 4a. It can be seen that the silver nanoparticles have melted to integrate to a whole, which reflects the bulk silver metallic luster. However, pores and voids among the nanoparticles are inevitable which limit the conductivity of patterns [40]. Post sintered conductive patterns by spray coating exhibited darker metallic luster compared to the inkjet printed one. It was mainly due to the insufficient evaporation of the stabilizer polymer, as shown in Figure 4b.