Noncompliance and nonpersistence can occur at three discrete points. OICR-9429 concentration patients can be noncompliant by not filling their prescription; they can be noncompliant by not initially taking their medicine as directed by their physician (correct dosing and time and manner of administration), or they can be noncompliant by missing doses. They can also stop their medication without telling their healthcare providers (nonpersistence). Consequences of poor compliance and persistence Poor compliance and persistence with osteoporosis medications

lead to diminished medication efficacy and, therefore, to less suppression of bone turnover [10] and lower gains in bone mineral density [11]. These in turn lead to higher fracture rates, [12–15], medical costs,

BTSA1 concentration and greater healthcare utilization including higher hospitalization rates [16]. Some refill compliance studies in patients with osteoporosis have examined the relationship between such compliance and fracture. Siris et al. [17] found that minimal and/or no effect on fracture risk is with refill compliance https://www.selleckchem.com/products/i-bet151-gsk1210151a.html below 50%, and a curvilinear decrease in probability of fracture is with refill compliance over 50%. In contrast, Curtis et al. did not find a threshold level of compliance below which there was no fracture reduction benefit, but rather a curvilinear effect throughout all ranges of refill compliance [18]. Similarly, among patients with osteoporosis by

bone mineral density criteria, Rabenda et al. [14] found a linear relationship between hip fracture reduction benefit and medication possession ratio throughout the entire range of refill compliance. Perhaps the most striking point was made by Feldstein [19] who found similar time to first fracture over an 8-year period of patients with osteoporosis as defined by bone density or fracture in patients who were treated with oral bisphosphonates versus those who were not treated with an osteoporosis medication. Her study suggests that although oral bisphosphonates are efficacious in randomized clinical trials Thiamet G (within which persistence and compliance are typically high), their efficacy does not translate to the community setting when patients do not fill their prescriptions, do not take their medications as prescribed, and are not persistent. Reasons for noncompliance Direct experience of adverse effects (such as stomach upset from an oral bisphosphonate) accounts for a significant proportion of nonpersistence and noncompliance. Even without directly experienced side effects, however, patients may stop their medication for a number of reasons [20]. They may not believe that they have osteoporosis or that they are not at much risk of fracture (e.g., they do not have a problem that requires a solution).