Int J Caspase cleavage Heat Mass Transfer 2009, 52:5792–5795.CrossRef 25. Aziz

A, Khan WA, Pop I: Free convection boundary layer flow past a horizontal flat plate embedded in porous medium filled by nanofluid containing gyrotactic microorganisms. Int J Thermal Sci 2012, 56:48–57.CrossRef 26. Rana P, Bhargava R, Beg OA: Numerical solution for mixed convection boundary layer flow of a nanofluid along an inclined plate embedded in a porous medium. Comput Math Appl 2012,64(9):2816–2832.CrossRef 27. Carnahan B, Luther HA, Wilkes JO: Applied Numerical Methods. John Wiley and Sons, New York; 1969. 28. Abd E-N, Elbrabary MA, Elsayed ME, Abdelazem Nader Y: Finite difference solution of radiation effects on MHD unsteady free-convection flow over vertical porous plate. Appl Math Comput 2004, 151:327–346.CrossRef 29. Hoffman JD: Numerical Methods for Engineers and Scientists. McGraw-Hill, New York; 1992. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors’ contributions ZU carried out

the formulation and CT99021 in vitro computation of the problem, found the PD0332991 ic50 results, and drafted the manuscript. SH read the manuscript and wrote the conclusion part of the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.”
“Background Quantum dot (QD) lasers are now extensively investigated for applications in low-cost metropolitan access and local area networks. However, most works on QD devices focus on lasers and detectors. There were only a handful of them that were related to quantum dot electroabsorption modulators (QD-EAMs) [1, 2]. For ease of monolithic integration, it is timely to investigate the use of QDs for electroabsorption modulators (EAMs). As such, one can then utilize QDs for both laser and EAM by the identical active layer approach [3, 4]. Recently, Chu et al. reported a small-signal frequency response of 2 GHz for the 1.3-μm QD-EAM [1]. However, the applied reverse bias CYTH4 was 4 V – which

could lead to complications for on-chip integration since energy consumption is an issue. We had previously reported the static performance of 1.3-μm QD-EAM based on as-grown QDs [5]. Due to the defined QD potential barriers, one can observe a suppression of absorption at reverse bias <2 V [6]. This implies that our as-grown QD-EAM will also require a significant reverse bias voltage (≥2 V in this case) for small-signal frequency response. Again, this is undesirable for on-chip integration. On the other hand, annealed QDs are proposed to be a good candidate for energy-efficient QD-EAM. By varying the annealing temperature, we are able to induce different diffusion lengths on the QD layers [7]. There are two mechanisms at work, the first being the exchange of In atoms from the InAs QD intermixing with the Ga atoms in its surrounding InGaAs QW and the second being the In-Ga interdiffusion through the InGaAs/GaAs interface [8].