Four of the nine mutations (9%) that were detected in embB306 indicating resistance to ethambutol were not detected by the DST method, giving the lowest rate of concordance (44.4%) of the PCR with the DST method. One of the greatest concerns of national tuberculosis control programs in several countries

is the emergence and spread of drug resistant and MDR-TB. The actual extent and type of drug-resistant tuberculosis in Jordan is unknown. To determine this, the present study characterized 100 M. tuberculosis strains by PCR that were identified as drug resistant in the reference laboratory for mycobacteria. This is the first investigation involving the molecular characterization of drug resistance of M.

tuberculosis clinical isolates from Jordan. It was initiated as a result of the growing demand for rapid molecular characterization DZNeP cost of Mycobacterium click here strains isolated from patients whose clinical details and history suggested the presence of drug-resistant M. tuberculosis, i.e. previous tuberculosis, recent immigration from or travel to an area with a high prevalence of MDR-TB, failure to respond to therapy, or contact with a known MDR-TB patient (Watterson et al., 1998). In this study, 34 isolates resistant to one or more of the tested drugs were identified. This is comparable to what has been reported in the neighboring countries, with resistance to isoniazid and rifampicin being more common than resistance to ethambutol. The World Health Organization has estimated the prevalence of MDR-TB in several Mediterranean and neighboring Roflumilast countries as follows: Bahrain 3.5%, Egypt 5%, Iran 7.1%, Iraq 5.6%, Israel 5.6%, Kuwait 2.4%, Lebanon 2.4%, Oman 1.8%, Qatar 1.1%, Saudi Arabia 3.4%, United Arab Emirates 3.8%, and Yemen 3.2% (WHO, 1997, 2000a, b, 2003). In Jordan, there is very limited documentation of MDR-TB cases. Previous studies reported that over 90% of the M. tuberculosis rifampicin-resistant

clinical isolates harbored mutations in the 81-bp core region of the rpoB516, rpoB526, and rpoB531, the most frequent (70–95%) worldwide (Bártfai et al., 2001; Mokrousov et al., 2003). The discrepancies between the molecular and phenotypic drug resistance reported in this study have been reported by others previously (Baldeviano-Vidalon et al., 2005; Chan et al., 2007; Plinke et al., 2009). These discrepancies are most likely caused by problems with conventional susceptibility testing (Plinke et al., 2009) or by a single base substitution of a silent point mutation. Another possibility is the presence of heterogeneous isolates or mixed populations of resistant and susceptible M. tuberculosis bacilli in the initial sputum specimens with mutant genotypes being recognized by the molecular assay and therefore masking or dominating the susceptible genotypes.