The antigen-specificity of the B cells was not investigated by flow cytometry but as strong pertussis-responses were detected in the other evaluations it is most likely induced by the vaccine. In the last years there has been a resurgence of pertussis cases and infant deaths in countries with high vaccination coverage [29], [30] and [31], emphasizing the need for a different vaccine approach to provide protection for the most susceptible infants. Studies have Tariquidar shown that a primary dose of a Pw-vaccine reduces the risk of pertussis compared to a primary dose of a Pa-vaccine [30], [31] and [32], and the live attenuated BPZE1 vaccine may be a promising priming candidate

in that context. It has been shown to protect infant mice against virulent B. pertussis challenge [12] and to provide long-term immunity, substantially longer than Pa [33]. Complementing the current pertussis immunization program with a birth-dose of BPZE1 in the future could therefore offer a better protection for the vulnerable infants. However, due to the immaturity of the infant immune system, especially with respect to IFN-γ producing CD4+ click here T cells [34] and [35], extensive studies of the BPZE1 safety and efficacy in declining age groups must be performed

before a birth dose of BPZE1 is implemented. In this regard it is, however, interesting to note that very young infants are able to induce a strong B. pertussis-specific IFN-γ producing CD4+ T cell response upon natural infection, in contrast

to vaccination with Pa [6]. In conclusion, the novel attenuated pertussis vaccine strain BPZE1 was able to induce pertussis-specific B-cell responses in colonized subjects. Nasopharyngeal colonization of not BPZE1 was, however, crucial for the induction of B-cells responses. With optimization, the BPZE1 is a promising candidate to supplement the current pertussis vaccination schedule and thereby provide protection against pertussis disease. Funding: This work was supported by the European Commission Framework Program 7 (Child-Innovac project, grant agreement number 201502). The trial was co-funded by the sponsor INSERM (Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale). Conflict of interest: CL and NM are inventors of patent applications on BPZE1. None of them have currently been out-licensed for commercial purposes. There are no further patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. The other authors declare no conflict of interest. Contributors: Conceived and designed the experiments: MJ, RT, SA, FC. Performed the experiments: MJ, SA, ML, LW. Analyzed the data: MJ, ML, SA, FC. Contributed materials: NM, CL. Wrote the paper: MJ, RT, CL, SA. All authors have read and approved the final version of this article.